such stunst
an
efflux of
revenne to be expected from as duties, fines ete and therefore (again banking serious effects due to the American unbayo te fuitas canning unemployment and population to China) it would seem safe not to leave quite such a
margin as hitherto, in estimating, to allow for contingencies. Much of the amplers in 1950/51 & in earlier years
reveme
from duties
suplus
was
due to
(notably tobacco)
dutres (notably
meal and
and entertainment; meal
taxes
see e.g. para s
3. The increase
other
(1) opposite.
in the expenditure
about $32 million
estimate for 1951/52 (of
Compared with 1950/51) is largely
and is caused by
in evitable
(a) unsettled conditions in the 7.5.
< (a) the
fact that H.K. is unable
to raise a loan
It is worth noting that the increase
over 1950/51 is
not
not really
as
laye
as
is suggested by comparing estimates suice the 1950/51 estimates contained no provision for the $16 million paid 't. H.M. G as a
contribution towards
the cost of the reinforcements whereas the 1951/52 estimates do nichude $5 1⁄2 million for this purpose. Of The other $24 million part is due to
the increase
of the curi defence
and
other requirements which can be land
at the
dcov
(a) 8
above
ana
part
is due to starting a five year
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.